SHOW / HIDE
Did our site help?
Make a donation
with PayPal today!

Index of /src/scrapers/slashdot

[ICO]NameLast modifiedSizeDescription
[DIR]Parent Directory  -
[TXT]4389441_Re:Sigh..html04-Oct-2002 03:04 728
[TXT]4389528_Re:Historical perspective..html04-Oct-2002 03:18 2.3K
[TXT]4389560_Re:Sigh..html04-Oct-2002 03:22 257
[TXT]4389581_Re:Crock of shit.html04-Oct-2002 03:26 442
[TXT]4389827_Re:Historical perspective..html04-Oct-2002 03:51 2.1K
[TXT]4389849_Re:Historical perspective..html04-Oct-2002 03:53 199
[TXT]4390441_Re:Funny.html04-Oct-2002 05:10 212
[TXT]4395821_Re:Crock.html04-Oct-2002 12:34 1.8K
[TXT]4399805_Re:Why don't they use standard CVS?.html06-Oct-2002 08:57 482
[TXT]4438468_Re:WINE.html12-Oct-2002 05:39 249
[TXT]4442823_Re:Everyone will still see it as slow.html13-Oct-2002 07:59 629
[TXT]4454681_Re:Nintendo too?.html15-Oct-2002 12:36 637
[TXT]4454868_Here we go again....html15-Oct-2002 12:55 374
[TXT]4454895_Re:Bullshit technology.html15-Oct-2002 12:58 262
[TXT]4457289_Re:Documentation.html15-Oct-2002 05:45 197
[TXT]4458292_Re:What's in it for consumers?.html15-Oct-2002 08:23 403
[TXT]4466016_Re:Illegal?.html16-Oct-2002 08:00 332
[TXT]4468599_Re:The ACLU Sucks!.html17-Oct-2002 08:31 269
[TXT]4471069_Re:IDE vs. SCSI Warranty.html17-Oct-2002 12:55 920
[TXT]4474374_Re:Does anyone here actually understand TCP_IP?.html17-Oct-2002 06:18 676
[TXT]4474554_Re:The ACLU Sucks!.html17-Oct-2002 06:48 402
[TXT]4494829_Re:SCSI.html21-Oct-2002 08:46 381
[TXT]4494956_Re:Why SCSI?.html21-Oct-2002 09:04 2.2K
[TXT]4495890_Re:Not Version Bloat..html21-Oct-2002 10:44 240
[TXT]4496656_Re:Protection..html21-Oct-2002 12:01 622
[TXT]4496767_Re:I like this idea....html21-Oct-2002 12:08 1.3K
[TXT]4496838_Re:FSP.html21-Oct-2002 12:13 935
[TXT]4497098_Re:Why SCSI?.html21-Oct-2002 12:36 3.0K
[TXT]4497149_Re:I like.html21-Oct-2002 12:41 958
[TXT]4497245_Btw.html21-Oct-2002 12:49 462
[TXT]4498949_Re:Protection..html21-Oct-2002 03:55 672
[TXT]4500405_Re:Why SCSI?.html21-Oct-2002 07:04 378
[TXT]4500477_Re:Why SCSI?.html21-Oct-2002 07:13 1.1K
[TXT]4501389_Re:Why SCSI?.html21-Oct-2002 10:07 156
[TXT]4502996_Re:rejection ?.html22-Oct-2002 06:58 262
[TXT]4508969_Re:Paypal, CDNow, tons of examples come to mind.html22-Oct-2002 06:53 3.7K
[TXT]4519988_Re:Argh..html23-Oct-2002 02:27 375
[TXT]4520003_Re:too bad that.html23-Oct-2002 02:30 570
[TXT]4523897_Re:a worse example.html24-Oct-2002 01:18 366
[TXT]4524006_Re:It's not just individuals....html24-Oct-2002 01:32 1.0K
[TXT]4538058_Re:Another troll article!.html26-Oct-2002 03:34 293
[TXT]4543536_Re:Contributions should be illegal.html27-Oct-2002 05:22 401
[TXT]4543611_Re:how long...html27-Oct-2002 05:40 503
[TXT]4550747_Re:NFS server performance.html28-Oct-2002 03:54 164
[TXT]4555092_Re:Grass Roots Movement.html28-Oct-2002 08:38 336
[TXT]4555129_Re:Apple ][ Forever !.html28-Oct-2002 08:46 271
[TXT]4555144_Re:Commodore 64 drives?.html28-Oct-2002 08:49 378
[TXT]4555188_Re:Better sooner than later.html28-Oct-2002 08:55 392
[TXT]4555244_Re:Commodore One.html28-Oct-2002 09:05 200
[TXT]4555296_Re:PDF format freer than Word?.html29-Oct-2002 09:13 572
[TXT]4557889_Re:And all of you running PPC or Alpha Linux.html29-Oct-2002 02:21 323
[TXT]4558148_Re:(OT) x86.html29-Oct-2002 02:51 778
[TXT]4565089_Re:Migrate.html30-Oct-2002 11:46 191
[TXT]4575026_Re:pet peeve, don't call us, we'll call you.html31-Oct-2002 06:30 453
[TXT]4576577_Re:pet peeve, don't call us, we'll call you.html31-Oct-2002 12:28 244
[TXT]4589623_Re:Am I the only one.html03-Nov-2002 02:51 717
[TXT]4590326_Re:Vint Cerf says Gore was 'instrumental' too..html01-Nov-2002 04:47 168
[TXT]4599595_Re:Not a big deal for Microsoft.html05-Nov-2002 10:43 430
[TXT]4599751_Re:Stock took a hit?.html04-Nov-2002 11:07 741
[TXT]4599771_Re:PDF = open format, won't go away.html04-Nov-2002 11:10 265
[TXT]4600694_Re:What are they trying to protect?.html05-Nov-2002 01:48 957
[TXT]4600713_Re:Distribution Method.html05-Nov-2002 01:51 345
[TXT]4600776_Re:Protect?.html05-Nov-2002 02:00 1.3K
[TXT]4600870_MOD UP..html05-Nov-2002 02:09 198
[TXT]4605080_Re:Transmeta needs to give up.html05-Nov-2002 10:32 240
[TXT]4611787_Re:Are you kidding?.html06-Nov-2002 04:47 1.3K
[TXT]4618298_Re:Missing a point.html07-Nov-2002 01:33 284
[TXT]4618361_Re:new FS....html07-Nov-2002 01:40 652
[TXT]4618400_Re:Where to begin.html07-Nov-2002 01:45 573
[TXT]4623520_Re:Where to begin.html07-Nov-2002 01:40 3.7K
[TXT]4623528_Re:new FS....html07-Nov-2002 01:43 883
[TXT]4626486_Re:Skinning == crap!.html08-Nov-2002 12:56 324
[TXT]4626895_Re:I use Dualhead in X.html07-Nov-2002 01:42 405
[TXT]4631255_Re:Where to begin.html07-Nov-2002 02:26 4.6K
[TXT]4647298_Re:Why Open Source Needs Microsoft.html11-Nov-2002 08:16 1.0K
[TXT]4647345_Re:Phew.html11-Nov-2002 08:23 1.0K
[TXT]4648357_Re:This is important stuff!.html11-Nov-2002 11:08 861
[TXT]4652812_Um.html12-Nov-2002 01:59 1.5K
[TXT]4652859_Re:Fujitsu Drives - Bad for some time.html12-Nov-2002 02:05 338
[TXT]4652954_Re:Could work.html12-Nov-2002 02:15 329
[TXT]4653016_Re:Security??.html12-Nov-2002 02:20 242
[TXT]4653047_Re:what a business.html12-Nov-2002 02:22 107
[TXT]4653113_Re:Wrong Douche bags!.html12-Nov-2002 02:29 204
[TXT]4653189_Re:Welcome to System Administration 101.html12-Nov-2002 02:37 251
[TXT]4654504_Re:Welcome to System Administration 101.html12-Nov-2002 05:09 1.2K
[TXT]4655356_Re:Welcome to System Administration 101.html12-Nov-2002 06:54 1.3K
[TXT]4656077_Re:OpenGL 2.0.html12-Nov-2002 09:04 252
[TXT]4656671_Re:OpenGL 2.0.html12-Nov-2002 10:59 197
[TXT]4674268_Re:EFF Endored Legislation?.html13-Nov-2002 09:32 409
[TXT]4674848_Re:DOS 6.2.html14-Nov-2002 11:37 203
[TXT]4678636_Re:DOS 6.2.html14-Nov-2002 01:19 192
[TXT]4678820_Re:How Sad.html15-Nov-2002 01:39 1.3K
[TXT]4682665_Re:I like the Windows community spirit.html13-Nov-2002 08:42 529
[TXT]4682706_Re:I'm a Lightwave dude....html13-Nov-2002 08:49 377
[TXT]4682781_Re:X has kept me away from Linux.html13-Nov-2002 09:04 538
[TXT]4682882_Re:What keeps me on windows.html13-Nov-2002 09:20 161
[TXT]4687907_Re:X has kept me away from Linux.html13-Nov-2002 07:22 378
[TXT]4687916_Re:X has kept me away from Linux.html13-Nov-2002 07:24 461
[TXT]4688256_um, mod up plz.html16-Nov-2002 08:41 182
[TXT]4688285_Re:Some useful RE links....html16-Nov-2002 08:49 276
[TXT]4688295_Re:You have to admit that this is hard.html16-Nov-2002 08:53 398
[TXT]4702596_Re:X has kept me away from Linux.html13-Nov-2002 07:34 1.9K
[TXT]4702992_Re:rebooting 4 or 5 times a week?.html18-Nov-2002 08:45 753
[TXT]4703150_Re:A little OT.html18-Nov-2002 09:23 768
[TXT]4703262_Re:It runs Linux and plays DVDs?.html18-Nov-2002 09:52 643
[TXT]4703327_Re:Crazy World.html18-Nov-2002 10:09 349
[TXT]4704247_Re:A little OT.html18-Nov-2002 02:09 1.1K
[TXT]4704260_Re:Someone explain this about BSD_Linux to me..html19-Nov-2002 02:14 683
[TXT]4704309_Re:X has kept me away from Linux.html13-Nov-2002 02:37 1.7K
[TXT]4704824_Re:A little OT.html18-Nov-2002 06:05 645
[TXT]4708556_Re:Crazy World.html18-Nov-2002 01:39 751
[TXT]4713319_Re:Their rules.html19-Nov-2002 12:25 242
[TXT]4713335_Re:Wow.html19-Nov-2002 12:29 392
[TXT]4713979_Re:Their rules.html19-Nov-2002 03:57 658
[TXT]4725093_Re:that's why.html21-Nov-2002 02:22 924
[TXT]4725400_Re:The Truth? You can't handle the truth.html21-Nov-2002 02:55 1.1K
[TXT]4725470_Re:Riddle me this Hasie?.html21-Nov-2002 03:03 623
[TXT]4725497_Re:Bingo!.html21-Nov-2002 03:06 746
[TXT]4726117_Re:Have they not seen Wierd Science.html21-Nov-2002 04:15 248
[TXT]4726775_Re:Hah squared!.html21-Nov-2002 05:22 574
[TXT]4726855_Re:Besides.html21-Nov-2002 05:30 479
[TXT]4726884_Re:Microsoft's contribution.html21-Nov-2002 05:33 217
[TXT]4729325_Re:Violating Service Contracts?.html22-Nov-2002 11:05 265
[TXT]4729356_Re:Have they not seen Wierd Science.html21-Nov-2002 11:12 242
[TXT]4729494_Re:The Truth? You can't handle the truth.html21-Nov-2002 11:36 1.0K
[TXT]4734878_Re:Pot. Kettle. Black..html22-Nov-2002 04:13 577
[TXT]4735132_Re:In all fairness to the switch ads.html22-Nov-2002 04:39 203
[TXT]4740488_Re:Bill Cares?.html23-Nov-2002 07:01 224
[TXT]4746398_Re:And while you're so hot about the movie....html24-Nov-2002 06:25 259
[TXT]4760939_Re:Windows and IE?.html25-Nov-2002 02:17 1.1K
[TXT]4760986_Re:I hate it.html25-Nov-2002 02:21 271
[TXT]4761511_Re:Explorer?.html25-Nov-2002 03:08 425
[TXT]4770712_Re:And while you're so hot about the movie....html24-Nov-2002 04:55 578
[TXT]4792111_Re:Good intentions, but....html01-Dec-2002 05:28 280
[TXT]4796357_Re:heh.html02-Dec-2002 04:06 787
[TXT]4796496_Water-cool your PC.....html02-Dec-2002 04:29 264
[TXT]4796796_Re:heh.html02-Dec-2002 05:07 4.4K
[TXT]4816831_Re:SCSI for workstations?.html04-Dec-2002 01:43 241
[TXT]4844736_Re:Whatever.....html09-Dec-2002 12:27 864
[TXT]4845181_Re:Use your own advice.html09-Dec-2002 01:32 1.0K
[TXT]4846448_Re:Use your own advice.html09-Dec-2002 03:59 1.9K
[TXT]4854474_Re:Use your own advice.html09-Dec-2002 10:14 1.4K
[TXT]4855221_A free interview?.html10-Dec-2002 12:03 261
[TXT]4857703_Re:*Sigh*.html10-Dec-2002 04:44 643
[TXT]4857726_Re:Good work..html10-Dec-2002 04:46 528
[TXT]4858377_Re:*Sigh*.html10-Dec-2002 05:58 403
[TXT]4867191_Re:Umbrella.html11-Dec-2002 07:54 947
[TXT]4870926_IN COMMUNIST CHINA.html11-Dec-2002 10:14 440
[TXT]4872756_Re:IN COMMUNIST CHINA.html11-Dec-2002 01:16 396
[TXT]4909288_Re:Great news? Or bad news?.html17-Dec-2002 02:22 682
[TXT]4909338_Re:in a word....html17-Dec-2002 02:26 755
[TXT]4909387_Re:Is this news?.html17-Dec-2002 02:32 490
[TXT]4911304_Re:Why boycotts are a risky business.html17-Dec-2002 06:00 672
[TXT]4926980_Re:Yes it could be.html19-Dec-2002 07:14 2.4K
[TXT]4927246_Re:Why does this matter to _.-ers?.html19-Dec-2002 08:25 468
[TXT]4927401_Re:More FUD.html19-Dec-2002 08:58 594
[TXT]4927417_Re:More FUD.html19-Dec-2002 09:03 762
[TXT]4927468_Re:Great Statement, I hope Apple listens..html19-Dec-2002 09:17 695
[TXT]4927514_Re:Woops.html19-Dec-2002 09:31 529
[TXT]4934383_Re:It is an oxymoron.html20-Dec-2002 11:00 175
[TXT]4938961_Re:Anything would be faster....html21-Dec-2002 11:03 512
[TXT]4940184_Re:Yes it could be grounds..html19-Dec-2002 09:34 747
[TXT]4940245_exploit?.html22-Dec-2002 09:57 355
[TXT]4940309_Re:exploit?.html22-Dec-2002 10:21 239
[TXT]4942492_Re:exploit?.html22-Dec-2002 09:13 181
[TXT]4951148_Re:That's ludicrous.html23-Dec-2002 06:53 1.5K
[TXT]4951179_Re:More MS bashing for fark's sake?!.html24-Dec-2002 07:06 1.1K
[TXT]4955808_Re:Linux is great for server duties.html20-Dec-2002 11:46 815
[TXT]4955860_Re:One man's fragmentation is another's variety ..html20-Dec-2002 12:07 251
[TXT]4956506_Re:More MS bashing for fark's sake?!.html24-Dec-2002 06:30 384
[TXT]4956509_Re:More MS bashing for fark's sake?!.html24-Dec-2002 06:32 776
[TXT]4959728_Re:Legislation isn't needed!.html25-Dec-2002 04:36 849
[TXT]4959731_Re:Legislation isn't needed!.html25-Dec-2002 04:39 724
[TXT]4965785_Re:Legislation isn't needed!.html25-Dec-2002 09:12 355
[TXT]4965834_Re:Legislation isn't needed!.html25-Dec-2002 09:19 522
[TXT]4976125_Re:Not surprised.html28-Dec-2002 08:36 927
[TXT]4983345_Re:preach to the choir.html30-Dec-2002 03:01 235
[TXT]4983419_Re:Nitpick..html30-Dec-2002 03:12 239
[TXT]4983453_Um..html30-Dec-2002 03:18 1.1K
[TXT]4987911_Re:Um..html30-Dec-2002 09:45 636
[TXT]4987976_Re:Um..html30-Dec-2002 09:54 1.4K
[TXT]4987991_Re:Um..html30-Dec-2002 09:59 946
[TXT]4988028_Re:really?.html28-Dec-2002 10:05 714
[TXT]4991077_Re:Um..html30-Dec-2002 05:41 1.6K
[TXT]4991125_Re:Um..html30-Dec-2002 05:51 1.2K
[TXT]5004745_Re:Um..html30-Dec-2002 03:02 1.5K
[TXT]5004803_Re:Um..html30-Dec-2002 03:25 2.9K
[TXT]5016804_Re:It is not supposed to work that way.html04-Jan-2003 08:31 399
[TXT]5017008_Re:Note that Free != freedom.html04-Jan-2003 09:18 791
[TXT]5017040_Re:Okay who's with me?.html04-Jan-2003 09:25 227
[TXT]5017110_Re:Bolixed..html04-Jan-2003 09:42 301
[TXT]5017156_Re:Here's my stand.html04-Jan-2003 09:50 795
[TXT]5017536_Re:Moral?.html03-Jan-2003 11:05 261
[TXT]5021025_Re:Why do you care so much?.html05-Jan-2003 03:27 474
[TXT]5027913_Re:Oops, they did it again..html06-Jan-2003 04:04 1.9K
[TXT]5034180_Re:Don't buy one!.html07-Jan-2003 01:36 577
[TXT]5034259_Re:A quick analysis looking over it.html07-Jan-2003 01:46 139
[TXT]5034277_Re:On XBOX Emulation.html07-Jan-2003 01:48 530
[TXT]5038107_Re:Don't buy one!.html07-Jan-2003 12:57 674
[TXT]5038148_Re:Oops, they did it again..html06-Jan-2003 01:07 814
[TXT]5109499_Re:Repost.html18-Jan-2003 04:49 303
[TXT]5110264_Re:Repost.html18-Jan-2003 06:59 389
[TXT]5112381_Re:And compromise compatibility with drivers, etc.html19-Jan-2003 04:57 261
[TXT]5130183_Re:Anyone else see the note at the top of the patc.html21-Jan-2003 05:24 339
[TXT]5159067_Re:But isnt it COOL to be anti-USA now?.html25-Jan-2003 06:52 1.1K
[TXT]5173359_Re:The wrongness is not that relevant.html28-Jan-2003 06:57 561
[TXT]5189782_Re:Self-installing programs are.html30-Jan-2003 12:08 545
[TXT]5193565_Re:in case of slashdotting.html31-Jan-2003 09:56 211
[TXT]5221324_Re:Free BSD Dying.html03-Feb-2003 02:49 242
[TXT]5234059_Re:And how do you flash a BIOS without a floppy?.html05-Feb-2003 03:35 276
[TXT]5252256_Re:GNU's take on Licenses.html07-Feb-2003 01:53 357
[TXT]5257351_Re:GNU's take on Licenses.html07-Feb-2003 04:07 624
[TXT]5257357_Re:you're an.html05-Feb-2003 04:11 487
[TXT]5277342_Re:GNU's take on Licenses.html07-Feb-2003 12:56 1.4K
[TXT]5303721_Re:They go through the air!.html14-Feb-2003 01:24 780
[TXT]5303748_Re:Wouldn't it be nice...?.html14-Feb-2003 01:27 402
[TXT]5318235_Re:GNU's take on Licenses.html07-Feb-2003 05:30 361
[TXT]5318836_Re:attitude?.html17-Feb-2003 09:09 1.6K
[TXT]5326818_Re:attitude?.html17-Feb-2003 12:19 628
[TXT]5329693_Re:elitism....html18-Feb-2003 05:26 220
[TXT]5329849_Re:attitude?.html17-Feb-2003 05:40 414
[TXT]5334256_Re:attitude?.html17-Feb-2003 08:51 777
[TXT]5414063_Re:The problems of GNOME.html28-Feb-2003 02:11 662
[TXT]5479085_Re:Inovate.html10-Mar-2003 02:50 442
[TXT]5482584_Re:Loud-mouthed weasel!.html11-Mar-2003 11:58 163
[TXT]5500475_Re:Two points...html12-Mar-2003 11:18 433
[TXT]5525581_Re:not gnu.html16-Mar-2003 06:48 184
[TXT]5527798_Re:no.html16-Mar-2003 04:51 631
[TXT]5543816_Re:Absolutely one step closer!.html19-Mar-2003 09:26 1.0K
[TXT]5565457_Re:Inaccuracies.html20-Mar-2003 11:24 372
[TXT]5571874_Re:XFree Obsolete?.html21-Mar-2003 09:50 426
[TXT]5585550_Re:I fail to see what the big deal is....html24-Mar-2003 03:39 286
[TXT]5592715_Re:XFree Obsolete?.html21-Mar-2003 01:42 656
[TXT]5681398_Re:Getting the corporate word out.html07-Apr-2003 04:06 733
[TXT]5681505_Re:Not exactly news ....html07-Apr-2003 04:23 1.1K
[TXT]5681521_Re:Editors?.html07-Apr-2003 04:26 623
[TXT]5686045_Re:Not exactly news ....html07-Apr-2003 09:56 1.8K
[TXT]5692947_Re:Not exactly news ....html07-Apr-2003 09:15 1.4K
[TXT]5694796_Re:Why the DMCA licks it....html09-Apr-2003 02:17 769
[TXT]5702875_Re:Not exactly news ....html07-Apr-2003 11:56 5.2K
[TXT]5705146_Re:Trust Big Brother!.html09-Apr-2003 03:42 1.5K
[TXT]5707936_Re:Hmm....html10-Apr-2003 11:02 761
[TXT]5712124_Re:I actually tried to check this out....html11-Apr-2003 01:21 533
[TXT]5712254_Re:I actually tried to check this out....html11-Apr-2003 01:39 637
[TXT]5714426_Re:I actually tried to check this out....html11-Apr-2003 07:57 456
[TXT]5714460_Re:I actually tried to check this out....html11-Apr-2003 08:08 1.6K
[TXT]5730521_Re:Can you say 'Ford Pinto'? I knew you could!.html14-Apr-2003 03:02 1.1K
[TXT]5732121_Re:So you are saying....html14-Apr-2003 06:28 662
[TXT]5732155_Re:Can you say 'Ford Pinto'? I knew you could!.html14-Apr-2003 06:32 255
[TXT]5733806_Re:So you are saying....html14-Apr-2003 12:43 510
[TXT]5763634_Good Job Slashdot!.html18-Apr-2003 10:25 164
[TXT]5767432_Re:....what the hell......html18-Apr-2003 11:36 272
[TXT]5786516_Re:For those having trouble playing it:.html22-Apr-2003 09:14 137
[TXT]5786916_Re:Even though the other dude is sort of trolling.html22-Apr-2003 10:38 349
[TXT]5787426_Re:Even though the other dude is sort of trolling.html22-Apr-2003 01:25 1.2K
[TXT]5787443_Re:What about Transgaming.html22-Apr-2003 01:31 318
[TXT]5820900_Re:Activists vs. anti-spam crowd.html27-Apr-2003 04:29 483
[TXT]5851585_Re:Getting 0wn3d.html01-May-2003 07:33 773
[TXT]5853270_Re:Sigh....html01-May-2003 11:26 1.2K
[TXT]5853361_Re:Mandatory?.html01-May-2003 11:36 1.2K
[TXT]5858571_Re:What about the Audio Home Recording Act?.html30-Apr-2003 07:43 588
[TXT]5858901_Re:Pronounciation.html01-May-2003 08:40 419
[TXT]5858932_Re:Don't Bother.html01-May-2003 08:44 657
[TXT]5858952_Re:SuSE 8.2 freezes.html01-May-2003 08:47 734
[TXT]5878159_Re:what a stupid flame..html03-May-2003 08:44 439
[TXT]5878172_Re:to be technically correct....html03-May-2003 08:46 539
[TXT]5878184_Re:GCC and glibc are the most important parts.html03-May-2003 08:49 383
[TXT]5883404_Re:How retarded.html05-May-2003 12:42 328
[TXT]5908601_Re:Release date.html07-May-2003 03:12 1.1K
[TXT]5908606_Re:Release date.html07-May-2003 03:15 323
[TXT]5925210_Re:I wish I.html09-May-2003 06:32 225
[TXT]5925301_Re:I wish I knew where I could find the MS fonts.html09-May-2003 07:29 216
[TXT]5950103_AFS vs NFS.html13-May-2003 06:24 852
[TXT]5952341_Re:AFS good on linux, good luck on FreeBSD.html13-May-2003 01:05 733
[TXT]6012837_Re:Touchy subject.html20-May-2003 09:50 395
[TXT]6130909_Re:I hate the Apple ][....html06-Jun-2003 07:40 769
[TXT]6130969_Re:Law is not the.html06-Jun-2003 07:57 1.1K
[TXT]6144474_Re:Only if they changed something....html08-Jun-2003 01:50 675
[TXT]6146546_Re:Only if they changed something....html08-Jun-2003 08:21 562
[TXT]6151514_Re:Speaking of FUD.html06-Jun-2003 11:43 513
[TXT]6156739_Re:Speaking of FUD.html06-Jun-2003 06:59 140
[TXT]6159126_Uh.html10-Jun-2003 03:25 602
[TXT]6172479_Re:No....html04-Jun-2003 11:40 784
[TXT]6178968_Dear lord.html12-Jun-2003 12:53 709
[TXT]6179410_Re:Poorly applied logic.html12-Jun-2003 02:31 1.0K
[TXT]6193215_Re:Phu-lease!.html13-Jun-2003 01:34 499
[TXT]6194140_Re:As if it will matter....html13-Jun-2003 02:52 540
[TXT]6197576_Re:As if it will matter....html13-Jun-2003 12:16 515
[TXT]6201251_Re:History?.html14-Jun-2003 05:10 1.0K
[TXT]6201267_Re:Mandatory defies the nature of open source.....html14-Jun-2003 05:16 885
[TXT]6202038_Re:News Flash, Ayanami....html14-Jun-2003 08:34 1.5K
[TXT]6202069_Re:History?.html14-Jun-2003 08:41 1.5K
[TXT]6202085_Re:Mandate Free Software.html14-Jun-2003 08:46 694
[TXT]6270110_Re:The GPL: Intellectual Theft.html22-Jun-2003 07:35 2.4K
[TXT]6270317_Re:No new CDs.html22-Jun-2003 08:22 291
[TXT]6315976_Re:To Be Fair.html27-Jun-2003 06:57 393
[TXT]6316296_Re:gnomemeeting? (warning - kinda long).html27-Jun-2003 07:46 320
[TXT]6322394_Re:Wasn't smart enough..html28-Jun-2003 08:03 523
[TXT]6329003_Re:The first person to mention.html29-Jun-2003 02:16 458
[TXT]6329313_Re:Installer.html29-Jun-2003 05:00 279
[TXT]6339295_Re:and if you act now.....html01-Jul-2003 10:11 346
[TXT]6339350_Re:Good reference, but 'copyleft' isn't more 'free.html01-Jul-2003 10:18 435
[TXT]6344667_Re:He is correct.html01-Jul-2003 06:30 356
[TXT]6350444_Re:The M.html02-Jul-2003 11:11 407
[TXT]6367395_Re:Waste of GNU, gains for MS.....html04-Jul-2003 10:39 765
[TXT]6373190_Re:"Can Open Source save Tom's Hardware".html05-Jul-2003 02:13 804
[TXT]6380713_Re:Not the full OS.html06-Jul-2003 10:27 802
[TXT]6386826_Re:They were lucky....html02-Jul-2003 05:50 385
[TXT]6388412_Re:README:.html06-Jul-2003 10:16 379
[TXT]6408021_Re:Make the darn drivers Open Source!.html10-Jul-2003 12:03 485
[TXT]6413027_Re:how wonderfully useless.html11-Jul-2003 02:05 850
[TXT]6429862_Re:IAWTP.html13-Jul-2003 04:36 866
[TXT]6468352_Re:The GPL is not viral..html17-Jul-2003 11:48 1.2K
[TXT]6483651_Re:Can someone explain what these programs DO?.html19-Jul-2003 08:23 287
[TXT]6651147_Re:Beginning to look Valid.html08-Aug-2003 06:27 896
[TXT]6651937_Re:dreamcast, too.html08-Aug-2003 08:31 757
[TXT]6661245_Re:Apple II graphics were different.html10-Aug-2003 04:26 323
[TXT]6661659_Design case history: the Commodore 64.html10-Aug-2003 05:48 614
[TXT]6672471_Re:Either way it's a good thing.html11-Aug-2003 11:19 1.3K
[TXT]6712220_BSD.html16-Aug-2003 09:43 216
[TXT]6778087_Re:Drivers.html24-Aug-2003 12:13 783
[TXT]6783695_Re:Sound Mixing.....html24-Aug-2003 09:14 458
[TXT]6817719_Re:yay (faker!).html28-Aug-2003 03:21 828
[TXT]6817765_Re:Good idea.html28-Aug-2003 03:24 309
[TXT]6896785_Mods on crack?.html07-Sep-2003 09:24 192
[TXT]6948267_Re:Your patent link is infringing.html12-Sep-2003 05:24 475
[TXT]7016045_Re:Telnet.html21-Sep-2003 01:38 714
[TXT]7166526_Re:What a stupid trend.html08-Oct-2003 04:51 1.0K
[TXT]7191312_Re:Wasn't there a similar case with some Linux syn.html11-Oct-2003 03:57 175
[TXT]7223431_Re:Stallman declined to be interviewed ....html15-Oct-2003 03:44 486
[TXT]7253145_Re:Very interesting comment about GNU libc.html19-Oct-2003 06:14 362
[TXT]7274625_Re:Unix administrators aren't mushrooms..html21-Oct-2003 03:23 474
[TXT]7312656_Re:C64.html26-Oct-2003 03:06 361
[TXT]7415831_Re:What isn't MS bundling into Longhorn?.html06-Nov-2003 08:28 537
[TXT]7449044_Re:Force change, not reform..html11-Nov-2003 06:24 404
[TXT]7524146_Re:I think....html20-Nov-2003 05:59 357
[TXT]7538237_Re:One cool thing in the roadmap....html22-Nov-2003 04:48 279
[TXT]7544254_Re:My first debian.html23-Nov-2003 06:40 307
[TXT]7564695_Um.....html25-Nov-2003 08:45 328
[TXT]7604596_Re:blah blah.html01-Dec-2003 07:18 232
[TXT]7611705_Re:Who cares? It's still digital.html02-Dec-2003 03:39 611
[TXT]7633150_Re:Integrity checks.html04-Dec-2003 04:44 479
[TXT]7642267_Re:AMD blows.html05-Dec-2003 04:10 339
[TXT]7704999_Re:On warnings.html12-Dec-2003 03:41 287
[TXT]7798258_Re:Good job NVIDIA.html23-Dec-2003 04:41 385
[TXT]7808907_Re:Two options.html25-Dec-2003 02:11 433
[TXT]7814905_Re:Linux Games.html26-Dec-2003 06:02 648
[TXT]7822752_Re:Those Cobalt cubes were cute....html28-Dec-2003 02:24 199
[TXT]7961978_Re:Weak? Not tested in court?.html12-Jan-2004 08:58 411
[TXT]8050050_Re:Best Keyboard....html21-Jan-2004 07:06 806
[TXT]8071373_Re:Name issues.html23-Jan-2004 06:56 526
[TXT]8078484_Re:New MS BIOS source code leaked!.html24-Jan-2004 08:59 659
[TXT]8086325_Re:!opteron == no dual proc.html26-Jan-2004 03:32 670
[TXT]8092790_Re:And thus....html26-Jan-2004 04:37 640
[TXT]8096563_Re:Hmm.html27-Jan-2004 10:43 379
[TXT]8139676_Re:nice.html30-Jan-2004 06:01 1.0K
[TXT]8147797_Re:Linux in cache?.html31-Jan-2004 09:51 1.1K
[TXT]8149364_Re:Linux in cache?.html31-Jan-2004 02:51 280
[TXT]8149389_Re:Linux in cache?.html31-Jan-2004 02:56 199
[TXT]8161988_Re:Anything NOT in Linux?.html02-Feb-2004 03:11 228
[TXT]8162572_Re:Anything NOT in Linux?.html02-Feb-2004 03:54 336
[TXT]8223395_Re:Open Source Software is one thing.html08-Feb-2004 01:46 528
[TXT]8255858_Re:PC Demo?.html11-Feb-2004 01:13 319
[TXT]8291818_Re:Binary drivers are inevitable.html15-Feb-2004 02:19 498
[TXT]8314769_Re:MAME cabinets.html17-Feb-2004 08:12 499
[TXT]8314942_Re:Correct use of "steal"!.html18-Feb-2004 08:41 1.8K
[TXT]8328839_Re:Institutional behaviour.html18-Feb-2004 01:16 688
[TXT]8328912_Re:Never a problem.html18-Feb-2004 01:20 555
[TXT]8328951_Re:And i thought it was normal...html18-Feb-2004 01:23 566
[TXT]8328999_Re:Hard drives and mainframe manufacturers.html18-Feb-2004 01:26 385
[TXT]8329577_Re:I can't wait....html19-Feb-2004 01:59 398
[TXT]8330006_Re:GPL.html18-Feb-2004 02:23 1.6K
[TXT]8330055_Re:Who cares?.html18-Feb-2004 02:25 548
[TXT]8330523_Re:Who cares?.html18-Feb-2004 02:50 589
[TXT]8375115_Re:GPL....html24-Feb-2004 12:39 1.3K
[TXT]8381099_Re:can x86-64 do big endian?.html24-Feb-2004 08:50 268
[TXT]8381442_I'm all for this.html24-Feb-2004 09:23 317
[TXT]8386893_Re:mount -o ro,loop dvdimg.iso _something_movietit.html25-Feb-2004 11:15 679
[TXT]8399400_Re:Criminal tools like "diff"?.html26-Feb-2004 01:09 259
[TXT]8433906_Re:radical rethinking of IP?.html01-Mar-2004 04:41 1.7K
[TXT]8434005_Re:No kidding? People prefer free?.html01-Mar-2004 04:50 1.0K
[TXT]8434117_Re:IPR isnt a problem in itself....html01-Mar-2004 05:00 949
[TXT]8434154_Re:So you want MORE coercion through force....html01-Mar-2004 05:05 315
[TXT]8434300_Re:The major problem is.html01-Mar-2004 05:25 1.7K
[TXT]8434460_Re:bad for economy too.html01-Mar-2004 05:44 843
[TXT]8434650_Re:...and Clemens' reaction.html01-Mar-2004 06:03 1.2K
[TXT]8435088_Re:Initrd tools?.html01-Mar-2004 06:57 902
[TXT]8435114_Re:Hello..html01-Mar-2004 07:01 185
[TXT]8435135_Re:Hello..html01-Mar-2004 07:03 327
[TXT]8437968_Re:bad for economy too.html01-Mar-2004 01:47 872
[TXT]8438350_Re:Are we turning into the Ferengi?.html01-Mar-2004 03:08 214
[TXT]8442977_Re:Tell me -.html19-Feb-2004 01:53 406
[TXT]8452646_Re:Gonna go buy.html03-Mar-2004 11:27 401
[TXT]8460965_Re:IPR isnt a.html01-Mar-2004 02:32 395
[TXT]8466072_Re:How To Hire Delopers? Mandatory read..html03-Mar-2004 01:44 551
[TXT]8487715_Re:closed source != bad always.html06-Mar-2004 06:18 768
[TXT]8507775_Re:Who actually pays?.html09-Mar-2004 03:05 248
[TXT]8522957_Re:Other ISPs start to do this?.html10-Mar-2004 01:12 1.0K
[TXT]8523146_Re:No No!.html10-Mar-2004 01:25 412
[TXT]8524850_Re:Sometimes they do....html10-Mar-2004 03:57 324
[TXT]8526052_Re:This isn't like overclocking your hard drive....html10-Mar-2004 05:37 505
[TXT]8560616_Re:True. XGItech is a co which did as much as poss.html13-Mar-2004 07:14 442
[TXT]8563620_Re:Fear Uncle Sam.html14-Mar-2004 04:55 191
[TXT]8595519_Re:Is it our right to restrict the use of our idea.html17-Mar-2004 11:14 1.0K
[TXT]8603647_Re:Virus protection on the chip?.html18-Mar-2004 04:54 749
[TXT]8618279_Re:From the looks of their page.html19-Mar-2004 10:53 826
[TXT]8623592_Re:Excellent!.html20-Mar-2004 07:01 1.4K
[TXT]8624277_Re:Oh no.html21-Mar-2004 08:52 217
[TXT]8631986_Re:protecting from viruses.html22-Mar-2004 01:37 1.7K
[TXT]8637369_Re:Xine? Mplayer?.html22-Mar-2004 03:14 812
[TXT]8641757_Re:Xine? Mplayer?.html22-Mar-2004 11:13 736
[TXT]8641889_Re:secure.html22-Mar-2004 11:36 715
[TXT]8642386_NWFS.html23-Mar-2004 01:05 1.0K
[TXT]8649207_Re:Abandonware.html23-Mar-2004 04:28 1.0K
[TXT]8655898_Re:I hope.....html24-Mar-2004 09:55 1.5K
[TXT]8656097_Re:Free as in "get out of my face".html24-Mar-2004 10:13 558
[TXT]8656320_Re:Free as in "get out of my face".html24-Mar-2004 10:31 2.5K
[TXT]8665058_Re:How can we fracture it?.html25-Mar-2004 02:04 607
[TXT]8665116_Re:Free as in "get out of my face".html24-Mar-2004 02:21 1.2K
[TXT]8665529_Re:But....html25-Mar-2004 04:50 813
[TXT]8665818_Re:microsoft abuses power.html25-Mar-2004 06:35 1.4K
[TXT]8680354_Re:Its a beautiful thing!.html25-Mar-2004 11:21 684
[TXT]8683695_Re:There were better GUIs.html26-Mar-2004 03:41 288
[TXT]8718003_Re:Amen..html30-Mar-2004 03:15 485
[TXT]8728267_Re:little kids?.html31-Mar-2004 02:51 2.2K
[TXT]8728349_Re:Go with your gut feeling.html31-Mar-2004 02:57 357
[TXT]8728397_Re:Backups are legit for some of us....html31-Mar-2004 03:00 249
[TXT]8728566_Re:Terrible research.html31-Mar-2004 03:11 1.0K
[TXT]8820743_Re:So what's it like in Taiwan?.html09-Apr-2004 04:55 1.1K
[TXT]8828951_Re:little kids?.html31-Mar-2004 12:31 1.1K
[TXT]8829021_Re:Amen..html30-Mar-2004 12:51 3.5K
[TXT]8834641_Re:So...What's the point?.html11-Apr-2004 09:04 226
[TXT]8837037_Re:Because I like PHP was: Um....html07-Apr-2004 08:46 713
[TXT]8840806_Re:RMS Blathering.html12-Apr-2004 03:13 2.5K
[TXT]8852701_Re:AFS doesn't work at my uni.html12-Apr-2004 03:50 458
[TXT]8881197_Re:Sadly....html16-Apr-2004 10:15 368
[TXT]8904539_Re:GPL?.html19-Apr-2004 10:14 2.4K
[TXT]8912055_Re:Notice....html19-Apr-2004 08:33 210
[TXT]8934521_Re:GPL?.html19-Apr-2004 06:14 255
[TXT]8934603_Re:So...What's the point?.html11-Apr-2004 06:22 503
[TXT]8945545_Re:Free, but not automatic.html22-Apr-2004 07:48 412
[TXT]8961161_Re:This is a very bad trend.html24-Apr-2004 04:33 231
[TXT]8980710_Re:Interesting.html26-Apr-2004 12:42 259
[TXT]8992558_Re:Finally....html28-Apr-2004 09:27 154
[TXT]9003004_Re:Well spoken..html28-Apr-2004 07:28 884
[TXT]9003045_Re:Someone failed Sesame Street.html28-Apr-2004 07:35 1.0K
[TXT]9031828_Re:Why open Java?.html01-May-2004 10:53 3.8K
[TXT]9077336_Re:good book!.html27-Apr-2004 03:48 532
[TXT]9091640_Hah.html07-May-2004 11:44 316
[TXT]9092025_Answer.html08-May-2004 02:02 245
[TXT]9113212_Re:Where are the English release notes?.html10-May-2004 09:23 737
[TXT]9171289_Re:License.html16-May-2004 02:06 307
[TXT]9202127_Re:Microsoft really pisses me off.html19-May-2004 02:53 526
[TXT]9206135_Re:I really don't see.html20-May-2004 12:38 326
[TXT]9211872_Re:Microsoft really pisses me off.html19-May-2004 11:36 320
[TXT]9211943_Re:I really don't see.html20-May-2004 11:51 1.2K
[TXT]9213207_Re:PF and ALTQ.html17-May-2004 04:45 333
[TXT]9225070_Re:web standards should ignore IE.html22-May-2004 11:16 835
[TXT]9236446_Re:FLAC?.html24-May-2004 07:07 333
[TXT]9236935_Re:FLAC?.html24-May-2004 08:18 372
[TXT]9237014_Re:It's called a "control"....html24-May-2004 08:27 716
[TXT]9247658_Re:Like building a plane.html25-May-2004 09:44 742
[TXT]9249994_Re:Like building a plane.html25-May-2004 12:36 1.8K
[TXT]9267832_Re:For the *BSD nay sayers.html27-May-2004 11:31 3.5K
[TXT]9267963_Re:Probably will hit 1.0 a year after Duke Nukem.html27-May-2004 11:40 1.5K
[TXT]9317041_Re:What is free? Is your free the same as mine?.html02-Jun-2004 12:54 1.0K
[TXT]9321489_Re:I don't get it..html02-Jun-2004 08:31 2.3K
[TXT]9322448_Re:What is free? Is your free the same as mine?.html02-Jun-2004 11:36 1.6K
[TXT]9322502_Re:For the *BSD nay sayers.html27-May-2004 11:45 788
[TXT]9322583_Re:For the *BSD nay sayers.html27-May-2004 12:02 3.3K
[TXT]9327908_Re:How about....html03-Jun-2004 01:07 193
[TXT]9332430_Re:massively offtopic, but important.html04-Jun-2004 12:03 354
[TXT]9332562_Re:How about....html03-Jun-2004 12:42 219
[TXT]9332577_Re:I don't get it..html02-Jun-2004 12:53 1.1K
[TXT]9337920_Re:Still got my BeBox..html04-Jun-2004 02:05 343
[TXT]9341556_Re:Still got my BeBox..html04-Jun-2004 08:10 203
[TXT]9341576_Re:How about....html03-Jun-2004 08:14 552
[TXT]9345876_Re:I've said this long ago....html05-Jun-2004 03:30 179
[TXT]9348090_Re:Replace it with a key.html05-Jun-2004 09:47 1.5K
[TXT]9348663_Re:Replace it with a key labelled [help].html05-Jun-2004 12:41 482
[TXT]9352397_Re:Lets see you do that for hundreds of systems.html06-Jun-2004 03:56 197
[TXT]9352549_Re:Replace it with a key labelled [help].html05-Jun-2004 04:27 565
[TXT]9354218_Re:Lets see you do that for hundreds of systems.html06-Jun-2004 10:58 542
[TXT]9363638_Re:Been said before, will be said again:.html08-Jun-2004 03:04 307
[TXT]9368019_Re:What is going on with the BSD's.html08-Jun-2004 12:31 3.3K
[TXT]9368220_Re:Once again, I'll have to disagree with this..html08-Jun-2004 12:47 1.0K
[TXT]9368312_Re:Did you read the story?.html08-Jun-2004 12:56 342
[TXT]9372996_Re:Wasn't it in Eclipse first?.html08-Jun-2004 08:30 657
[TXT]9373138_Re:Using the right tool for the job.html08-Jun-2004 08:47 2.1K
[TXT]9373310_Re:Using the right tool for the job.html08-Jun-2004 09:13 248
[TXT]9382767_Re:What else besides games?.html09-Jun-2004 06:29 204
[TXT]9383145_Re:Hmmm.html09-Jun-2004 07:29 382
[TXT]9383748_Re:Using the right tool for the job.html08-Jun-2004 09:42 503
[TXT]9383761_Re:Oh, the irony..html08-Jun-2004 09:44 329
[TXT]9383776_Re:Using the right tool for the job.html08-Jun-2004 09:47 264
[TXT]9383879_Re:Using the right tool for the job.html08-Jun-2004 10:11 2.0K
[TXT]9383890_Re:Using the.html08-Jun-2004 10:15 615
[TXT]9393460_Re:Easy to Find Out.html10-Jun-2004 06:44 374
[TXT]9393761_Re:No posts thus far - an omen?.html07-Jun-2004 07:36 2.1K
[TXT]9393769_Re:No posts thus far - an omen?.html07-Jun-2004 07:38 479
[TXT]9403088_Re:obligatory.html08-Jun-2004 05:56 189
[TXT]9403108_Re:obligatory.html08-Jun-2004 05:59 241
[TXT]9406673_Re:80386 was more significant..html12-Jun-2004 10:08 679
[TXT]9440161_Re:Kids.html15-Jun-2004 05:40 495
[TXT]9440187_Re:Fighting a losing battle.html15-Jun-2004 05:47 643
[TXT]9447195_Re:User level virus.html16-Jun-2004 06:19 472
[TXT]9589654_Re:Uh okay.html02-Jul-2004 12:43 710
[TXT]9602730_Re:like there is any chance this WON'T happen.html03-Jul-2004 06:47 286
[TXT]9612916_Re:Economics and politics and software.html05-Jul-2004 09:41 700
[TXT]9620948_Re:I will never shop Best Buy, and here is why....html06-Jul-2004 09:06 381
[TXT]9668652_Re:It's the hardware too!.html11-Jul-2004 03:27 475
[TXT]9685035_Re:Probably still RH_Fedora....html13-Jul-2004 08:01 160
[TXT]9692002_Re:Probably still RH_Fedora....html13-Jul-2004 06:33 215
[TXT]9692022_Re:Probably still RH_Fedora....html13-Jul-2004 06:36 241
[TXT]9703849_Re:Probably still RH_Fedora....html13-Jul-2004 10:21 306
[TXT]9749868_Re:Cheapest way to play Doom 3.html20-Jul-2004 10:52 372
[TXT]9749937_Re:Cheapest way to play.html20-Jul-2004 10:58 825
[TXT]9750051_Re:That's beside the point.html19-Jul-2004 11:05 362
[TXT]9750094_Re:Holy God ....html19-Jul-2004 11:09 199
[TXT]9755946_Re:Cue the Flash-bashers....html20-Jul-2004 09:24 251
[TXT]9762371_Re:Cue the Flash-bashers....html20-Jul-2004 02:04 222
[TXT]9762453_Re:Cheapest way to play Doom 3.html20-Jul-2004 02:10 939
[TXT]9762526_Re:That's beside the point.html19-Jul-2004 02:15 1.2K
[TXT]9762572_Re:That's beside the point.html19-Jul-2004 02:19 852
[TXT]9762805_Re:fair and balanced?.html21-Jul-2004 02:38 362
[TXT]9762836_Re:Attack of the Weak Analogies.html21-Jul-2004 02:41 380
[TXT]9768873_Re:Link has little info about bios.html22-Jul-2004 08:09 1.1K
[TXT]9768920_Re:Steps Against DRM.html22-Jul-2004 08:17 1.9K
[TXT]9783934_Re:Don't vote Libertarian.html23-Jul-2004 04:05 164
[TXT]9783972_Re:I no longer care.html23-Jul-2004 04:09 591
[TXT]9787419_Re:maturation of the software industry.html23-Jul-2004 12:55 133
[TXT]9789060_LOOK SCREEN.html24-Jul-2004 11:06 127
[TXT]9792494_Re:The lesson of X11.....html24-Jul-2004 11:19 1.0K
[TXT]9796704_Just like circumcision.html25-Jul-2004 05:42 514
[TXT]9798177_Re:FYI.html25-Jul-2004 10:27 845
[TXT]9798193_Re:A Clockwork Orange.html25-Jul-2004 10:30 296
[TXT]9798224_Re:Think Cigarettes company brand Crack....html25-Jul-2004 10:36 226
[TXT]9804562_Re:Free Software.html25-Jul-2004 02:19 728
[TXT]9804605_Re:Astroturfing or another troll ?.html25-Jul-2004 02:21 1.1K
[TXT]9808425_Re:LOOK SCREEN.html24-Jul-2004 11:04 182
[TXT]9822941_Re:Future source code release..html28-Jul-2004 12:46 238
[TXT]9825119_Re:Another solution in search of problem.html28-Jul-2004 03:45 939
[TXT]9825343_Re:Another solution in search of problem.html28-Jul-2004 04:01 2.5K
[TXT]9825378_Re:NFS4 is not supported in Windows.html28-Jul-2004 04:04 946
[TXT]9825425_Re:Another solution in search of problem.html28-Jul-2004 04:08 443
[TXT]9837685_Re:Home Run.html29-Jul-2004 05:18 280
[TXT]9839240_Re:Commodore still in business?.html07-Feb-2005 10:09 729
[TXT]9844207_Re:gates is cool.html30-Jul-2004 10:39 908
[TXT]9846353_Re:gates is cool.html30-Jul-2004 01:24 2.0K
[TXT]9853981_Re:I have done LD transfers.html30-Jul-2004 03:11 2.3K
[TXT]9854010_Re:Some thoughts....html30-Jul-2004 03:16 224
[TXT]9865353_Re:It's possible, I suppose..html02-Aug-2004 05:30 1.2K
[TXT]9865403_Re:Sure.html02-Aug-2004 05:40 302
[TXT]9872094_Re:Debian....html03-Aug-2004 04:11 453
[TXT]9891341_Re:Canary.html05-Aug-2004 01:08 259
[TXT]9892745_Re:Sure.html02-Aug-2004 02:51 347
[TXT]9900019_Re:The biggest problem Linux currently has.html05-Aug-2004 11:34 376
[TXT]9901151_Re:Bogus conclusions..html05-Aug-2004 01:18 441
[TXT]9901235_Re:Bogus conclusions. This is the reason..html05-Aug-2004 01:24 950
[TXT]9914451_Re:Canary.html05-Aug-2004 01:42 136
[TXT]9914523_Re:Screenshots.html08-Aug-2004 01:53 390
[TXT]9931480_Re:This is hilarious....html10-Aug-2004 12:39 866
[TXT]9972636_Re:The answer (not 42 this time).html14-Aug-2004 01:56 1.2K
[TXT]10003891_Re:Currect track record.html17-Aug-2004 12:56 522
[TXT]10036334_Re:first things first--.html21-Aug-2004 01:26 486
[TXT]10044134_Re:right direction.html22-Aug-2004 09:12 554
[TXT]10058013_Re:DirectX.html24-Aug-2004 12:02 299
[TXT]10072440_Re:*raises hand*.html25-Aug-2004 04:12 2.8K
[TXT]10072588_Re:ACPI.html25-Aug-2004 04:28 2.3K
[TXT]10072648_Re:My idea.html25-Aug-2004 04:36 732
[TXT]10074374_Re:ACPI.html25-Aug-2004 07:57 1.3K
[TXT]10084783_Re:ACPI.html25-Aug-2004 09:46 550
[TXT]10104007_heh.html29-Aug-2004 02:57 303
[TXT]10112670_Re:Longhorn.html30-Aug-2004 05:01 237
[TXT]10118945_Re:Let me ask everyone here....html31-Aug-2004 10:55 473
[TXT]10123566_Hits from what?.html31-Aug-2004 05:55 283
[TXT]10134195_Re:Other good Options.html07-Feb-2005 10:07 249
[TXT]10145809_Re:FUD?.html02-Sep-2004 10:07 512
[TXT]10164127_Re:My part to end this foolishness.html05-Sep-2004 03:37 241
[TXT]10170601_Re:It's All Downhill.html06-Sep-2004 02:45 2.1K
[TXT]10182584_Re:Patents and Copyright.html07-Sep-2004 04:50 423
[TXT]10193730_Penny Arcade said it best....html08-Sep-2004 03:03 371
[TXT]10222905_Re:Porting the whine...html11-Sep-2004 05:10 176
[TXT]10222924_Re:Port the IE rendering engine.html11-Sep-2004 05:12 239
[TXT]10223517_Re:To suggest this is almost criminally stupid.html11-Sep-2004 06:38 185
[TXT]10229764_Best solution.html12-Sep-2004 04:47 445
[TXT]10238213_Re:Federal Regulators..html13-Sep-2004 01:34 341
[TXT]10238413_Re:Mixed feelings about piracy.html13-Sep-2004 01:51 497
[TXT]10238445_Re:Regulation.html13-Sep-2004 01:53 498
[TXT]10240221_Re:No.html13-Sep-2004 04:40 759
[TXT]10241604_Re:How do we get there from here?.html13-Sep-2004 06:51 4.4K
[TXT]10241663_Re:I want the opposite!.html13-Sep-2004 06:56 574
[TXT]10241713_Re:Regulation.html13-Sep-2004 07:02 240
[TXT]10242122_Re:I want the opposite!.html13-Sep-2004 07:49 269
[TXT]10242342_Re:I want the opposite!.html13-Sep-2004 08:23 258
[TXT]10251880_Re:fakechroot.html13-Sep-2004 08:15 169
[TXT]10251890_My mother doesn't think so.html14-Sep-2004 08:18 182
[TXT]10269721_Re:Perhaps is the user base of those versions?.html16-Sep-2004 02:28 233
[TXT]10269763_Re:Perhaps is the user base of those versions?.html16-Sep-2004 02:30 633
[TXT]10271988_Re:Answer2 - interesting reasoning....html16-Sep-2004 05:32 918
[TXT]10273165_Re:Yeah, I was worried too....html16-Sep-2004 08:05 241
[TXT]10273179_Re:Somebody is busy ....html16-Sep-2004 08:07 342
[TXT]10277137_Re:MS stands behind its products?.html17-Sep-2004 10:58 259
[TXT]10301580_Code.html20-Sep-2004 04:10 316
[TXT]10302319_Re:Darn....html20-Sep-2004 05:16 257
[TXT]10313188_Re:Darn....html20-Sep-2004 04:35 348
[TXT]10321393_Re:glut?.html22-Sep-2004 01:58 203
[TXT]10322853_Re:glut?.html22-Sep-2004 03:58 150
[TXT]10341634_Re:Dynamically linking OK?.html21-Sep-2004 12:18 870
[TXT]10341688_Re:"Derivative" is a legal term, not a technical t.html21-Sep-2004 12:22 594
[TXT]10341758_Re:Another view on OS_GPL.html21-Sep-2004 12:26 830
[TXT]10341918_Re:Funny....html21-Sep-2004 12:38 1.3K
[TXT]10342014_Re:Funny....html21-Sep-2004 12:45 2.1K
[TXT]10366586_Re:Why would this lure them away?.html27-Sep-2004 04:08 220
[TXT]10369842_Re:18-35 #6 DRUG POLICY.html28-Sep-2004 10:44 363
[TXT]10370000_Re:18-35 #7 DRUG POLICY.html28-Sep-2004 11:01 2.1K
[TXT]10370446_Re:18-35 #6 DRUG POLICY.html28-Sep-2004 12:06 168
[TXT]10377576_Re:Congrats, but be wary of monocultures....html28-Sep-2004 03:54 341
[TXT]10380417_Re:18-35 #7 DRUG POLICY.html28-Sep-2004 10:27 166
[TXT]10380479_Re:18-35 #7 DRUG POLICY.html28-Sep-2004 10:35 758
[TXT]10380493_Re:18-35 #7 DRUG POLICY.html28-Sep-2004 10:37 1.4K
[TXT]10386321_Re:What's wrong?.html29-Sep-2004 01:54 385
[TXT]10390488_Re:18-35 #7 DRUG POLICY.html28-Sep-2004 09:15 352
[TXT]10397404_Does innovation suffer?.html30-Sep-2004 01:40 443
[TXT]10406321_Re:what my party should be?.html01-Oct-2004 12:37 345
[TXT]10414419_Re:Seems to me to be a bit... *duh*.html02-Oct-2004 01:33 605
[TXT]10414907_Re:Seems to me to be a bit... *duh*.html02-Oct-2004 02:34 543
[TXT]10421386_Re:The War on Drugs funds Terrorists.html03-Oct-2004 02:05 515
[TXT]10421397_Re:So is alcohol.html03-Oct-2004 02:07 282
[TXT]10421435_Re:So is alcohol-Nature Neutering..html03-Oct-2004 02:13 769
[TXT]10421452_Re:Guess who loses?.html03-Oct-2004 02:15 228
[TXT]10423336_Re:How is software really different?.html03-Oct-2004 07:39 489
[TXT]10428701_Re:How is software really different?.html03-Oct-2004 09:27 249
[TXT]10433969_Re:Chip Spec's would be better.html04-Oct-2004 04:40 501
[TXT]10436901_Re:Needed... bad.html05-Oct-2004 12:26 224
[TXT]10443964_Re:Biggest problem with Unix.html05-Oct-2004 03:23 430
[TXT]10444645_Re:Why not use SDL?.html05-Oct-2004 04:19 301
[TXT]10453815_Re:Exchange ?.html06-Oct-2004 03:21 182
[TXT]10454694_Re:register_globals = off.html05-Oct-2004 05:05 198
[TXT]10507289_Re:CherryOS's speed claims, at least, are fraudule.html12-Oct-2004 03:52 351
[TXT]10516719_Re:Because we have a TWO PARTY SYSTEM.html13-Oct-2004 03:01 313
[TXT]10540068_Re:Both Amiga and OS_2?.html15-Oct-2004 04:28 221
[TXT]10546216_Re:Best quotes.html16-Oct-2004 03:36 548
[TXT]10556211_Re:Sweet! Bring it on back =).html18-Oct-2004 09:53 279
[TXT]10556232_Re:What this love will consist of.html18-Oct-2004 09:56 497
[TXT]10561125_Re:The best programmer of all time???.html18-Oct-2004 08:37 450
[TXT]10566302_Re:Reality Distortion Fields ON!.html19-Oct-2004 11:22 285
[TXT]10567848_Re:Reality Distortion Fields ON!.html19-Oct-2004 01:50 264
[TXT]10567986_Re:What's so great about FreeBSD 5?.html19-Oct-2004 02:01 966
[TXT]10568077_Re:What's so great about FreeBSD 5?.html19-Oct-2004 02:08 1.0K
[TXT]10572081_Re:Reality Distortion Fields ON!.html19-Oct-2004 10:10 1.4K
[TXT]10572177_Re:What's so great about FreeBSD 5?.html19-Oct-2004 10:26 564
[TXT]10572201_Re:What's so great about FreeBSD 5?.html19-Oct-2004 10:31 705
[TXT]10595251_Re:Secrets.html22-Oct-2004 11:31 431
[TXT]10595266_Re:How about a Free Software Friendly Audio Card?.html22-Oct-2004 11:33 248
[TXT]10595368_Re:Reality.html19-Oct-2004 11:53 182
[TXT]10602766_Re:This isn't about "hardship". It's about numbers.html22-Oct-2004 03:13 1.7K
[TXT]10618652_Re:We knew this day would come.html24-Oct-2004 01:59 302
[TXT]10635916_De-allegizing existing cats?.html26-Oct-2004 05:14 416
[TXT]10650101_Re:As I remember....html27-Oct-2004 11:00 889
[TXT]10650167_Re:Progress.html27-Oct-2004 11:12 220
[TXT]10688565_Re:Merkey's effect on Linux NTFS support.html01-Nov-2004 01:20 428
[TXT]10712094_Re:Open Cores?.html03-Nov-2004 12:07 278
[TXT]10747627_Re:Indeed - you're full of What If's....html06-Nov-2004 01:53 454
[TXT]10755870_Re:Sometimes you gotta take a look around..html07-Nov-2004 12:14 407
[TXT]10756033_Re:Sure, blame C and C++.html07-Nov-2004 12:29 1.8K
[TXT]10756120_Re:Blaming the language....html07-Nov-2004 12:36 758
[TXT]10757719_Re:An anecdote and an opinion..html08-Nov-2004 02:48 1.4K
[TXT]10761368_Re:An anecdote and an opinion..html08-Nov-2004 07:31 700
[TXT]10761391_Re:Sometimes you gotta take a look around..html07-Nov-2004 07:33 308
[TXT]10761554_Re:Sure, blame C and C++.html07-Nov-2004 07:54 4.0K
[TXT]10766836_Re:frist?.html09-Nov-2004 11:50 304
[TXT]10777089_Re:I am the parent poster and I agree.html10-Nov-2004 10:50 726
[TXT]10796178_Re:Pirating Old NES Games?.html11-Nov-2004 03:19 569
[TXT]10796187_Re:Piracy in China.html11-Nov-2004 03:21 711
[TXT]10802274_Re:No version 2?.html12-Nov-2004 04:34 318
[TXT]10816212_Re:What's wrong with freezing a drive?.html14-Nov-2004 07:50 304
[TXT]10816294_not free software.html14-Nov-2004 08:01 1.1K
[TXT]10817813_Re:Piracy in China.html11-Nov-2004 01:17 687
[TXT]10825575_Re:dry joints.html14-Nov-2004 07:36 212
[TXT]10835886_Medical practices and malpractices.html16-Nov-2004 04:54 1.1K
[TXT]10850305_Re:dry joints.html14-Nov-2004 11:28 234
[TXT]10866061_Re:Or better yet....html19-Nov-2004 01:04 221
[TXT]10873102_Re:Common knowledge?.html16-Nov-2004 02:12 205
[TXT]10888979_Re:Let's make everything free!.html22-Nov-2004 11:52 554
[TXT]10889007_Re:Threading on thin ice here.html22-Nov-2004 11:55 129
[TXT]10889060_Re:Just to play devils advocate.html22-Nov-2004 11:59 440
[TXT]10889133_Talking out of both sides of their mouth.html22-Nov-2004 12:05 498
[TXT]10889192_Re:As a consequence of purchasing intel.html22-Nov-2004 12:11 1.1K
[TXT]10889254_Re:How to be an effective advocate.html22-Nov-2004 12:16 851
[TXT]10889371_Re:LAMP.html22-Nov-2004 12:28 591
[TXT]10892675_Re:Interesting book but.html17-Nov-2004 05:45 179
[TXT]10892693_Re:My guess.html17-Nov-2004 05:48 268
[TXT]10892746_Re:The Desktop.html22-Nov-2004 05:55 804
[TXT]10900160_Re:Confused....html22-Nov-2004 12:49 554
[TXT]10903626_Re:Please don't make them require root access..html23-Nov-2004 05:03 250
[TXT]10903656_Re:Whoa - "perfectly"? I think not..html23-Nov-2004 05:07 436
[TXT]10910809_Re:In other news....html24-Nov-2004 01:21 307
[TXT]10911221_Re:Confused....html22-Nov-2004 02:05 1.4K
[TXT]10911287_Re:The Desktop.html22-Nov-2004 02:11 684
[TXT]10932777_Re:I'm not sure how I feel about this.html27-Nov-2004 03:34 397
[TXT]10938535_Re:Waste of time.html28-Nov-2004 03:32 225
[TXT]10943746_Re:Whaa?.html29-Nov-2004 12:23 174
[TXT]10947875_Re:in other words: why open source software's ille.html29-Nov-2004 06:25 405
[TXT]10954572_Re:Breaks Gentoo as a learning tool.html30-Nov-2004 01:21 361
[TXT]10959608_Re:don't know.html30-Nov-2004 09:23 750
[TXT]10959697_Re:this will totally crush BSD.html30-Nov-2004 09:40 296
[TXT]10960312_Re:I'm not sure how I feel about.html27-Nov-2004 11:32 354
[TXT]10975694_Re:Real Window Managers.html02-Dec-2004 12:19 532
[TXT]10992716_Re:Breaks Gentoo as a learning tool.html30-Nov-2004 06:23 736
[TXT]10993889_Re:MySQL sucks.html02-Dec-2004 09:07 740
[TXT]10998333_Re:Dow-chem chairman Warren Anderson.html03-Dec-2004 05:50 330
[TXT]11005701_Re:MySQL sucks.html02-Dec-2004 01:03 519
[TXT]11007524_Re:good opportunity to say.html06-Dec-2004 10:28 507
[TXT]11009485_Re:NASA has little time (and money).html06-Dec-2004 02:10 385
[TXT]11015397_Re:Timely topic, IMHO.....html06-Dec-2004 01:37 1.0K
[TXT]11020678_Re:that's not the goddamn point.html06-Dec-2004 12:58 556
[TXT]11023813_Re:Egalitarian? Who are.html07-Dec-2004 04:20 488
[TXT]11026045_Re:I found the truth!.html07-Dec-2004 06:51 1.4K
[TXT]11026079_Re:Evolution.html07-Dec-2004 06:53 305
[TXT]11068841_Re:for all the slocate guys.html12-Dec-2004 06:36 594
[TXT]11068854_Re:Searching file content!.html12-Dec-2004 06:40 233
[TXT]11068867_Re:Searching file content!.html12-Dec-2004 06:43 168
[TXT]11069515_Re:I found the truth!.html07-Dec-2004 08:52 487
[TXT]11069530_Re:I found the truth!.html07-Dec-2004 08:55 526
[TXT]11070557_Progress Quest.html07-Feb-2005 09:55 155
[TXT]11074627_Re:I miss SGI.html13-Dec-2004 02:24 322
[TXT]11076837_Re:simplify the instruction set..html13-Dec-2004 06:04 854
[TXT]11085146_Let me be the first to say....html14-Dec-2004 03:53 123
[TXT]11085216_Re:I don't think so.html14-Dec-2004 03:57 258
[TXT]11085692_Re:Too many opcodes?.html14-Dec-2004 04:28 787
[TXT]11085741_Re:Who comes up with these ideas.html14-Dec-2004 04:31 304
[TXT]11089093_Re:VHDL + FPGA.html14-Dec-2004 09:16 252
[TXT]11089447_Re:ReactOS?.html15-Dec-2004 10:08 476
[TXT]11092431_Re:The point?.html15-Dec-2004 10:23 722
[TXT]11092573_Re:Cygwin RULES.html15-Dec-2004 10:39 538
[TXT]11095941_.gnu TLD.html15-Dec-2004 03:00 232
[TXT]11096030_Re:Platform or application?.html14-Dec-2004 03:07 919
[TXT]11096106_Re:Device drivers.html14-Dec-2004 03:13 1.0K
[TXT]11096173_Re:Device drivers.html14-Dec-2004 03:18 787
[TXT]11096226_Re:Device drivers.html14-Dec-2004 03:22 656
[TXT]11096289_Re:it's easy to speed up boot.html15-Dec-2004 03:27 241
[TXT]11099231_Re:it's easy to speed up boot.html15-Dec-2004 08:23 264
[TXT]11100919_Re:Device drivers.html14-Dec-2004 12:14 604
[TXT]11100936_Re:MOD PARENT UP.html14-Dec-2004 12:19 500
[TXT]11110552_Re:Deja Voodoo.html16-Dec-2004 06:28 320
[TXT]11110583_Re:Advantage?.html15-Dec-2004 06:32 558
[TXT]11113912_Re:The point?.html15-Dec-2004 03:20 1.5K
[TXT]11113988_Re:Device drivers.html14-Dec-2004 03:47 913
[TXT]11118330_Re:Hello it's me again.html17-Dec-2004 01:47 211
[TXT]11118447_Re:Hello it's me again.html17-Dec-2004 01:56 1.4K
[TXT]11134135_Re:It's a major issue..html18-Dec-2004 09:16 307
[TXT]11134507_Re:I don't think so.html14-Dec-2004 10:18 348
[TXT]11141326_Re:Radio Edit....html20-Dec-2004 05:33 561
[TXT]11141367_Re:FreeBSD has it figured out.html20-Dec-2004 05:37 497
[TXT]11141427_Re:"linux standardization".html20-Dec-2004 05:41 492
[TXT]11141484_Re:I'm sorry for the LSB guys.html20-Dec-2004 05:46 466
[TXT]11154015_Re:IE?.html21-Dec-2004 06:45 189
[TXT]11154132_Re:Fun Facts Time!.html21-Dec-2004 06:57 183
[TXT]11175561_Re:what about dual?.html23-Dec-2004 05:34 816
[TXT]11196120_Re:Don't fuck around w_your modem's MAC..html27-Dec-2004 08:12 608
[TXT]11196176_Re:This may not be that bad....html27-Dec-2004 08:23 361
[TXT]11196428_Re:This quote sums it up.html27-Dec-2004 09:05 285
[TXT]11196592_Re:Somehow not impressed?.html27-Dec-2004 09:39 1.1K
[TXT]11198144_Re:Intel Generations?.html27-Dec-2004 05:06 1.0K
[TXT]11198154_Re:Respect to.html27-Dec-2004 05:11 509
[TXT]11198187_Re:886.html27-Dec-2004 05:24 1.8K
[TXT]11206117_Re:Intel Generations?.html27-Dec-2004 10:53 604
[TXT]11206523_Re:Anybody else find this disturbing?.html28-Dec-2004 12:18 524
[TXT]11206540_Re:The [Crimminal] is out of the bottle....html28-Dec-2004 12:22 514
[TXT]11223726_copyright?.html30-Dec-2004 07:17 488
[TXT]11239472_Re:Spooks and cracks.html01-Jan-2005 03:07 203
[TXT]11241931_Re:ET runs well.html02-Jan-2005 11:41 256
[TXT]11300285_Re:They're stealing from ME....html08-Jan-2005 06:40 1.3K
[TXT]11300337_Re: keep the politics out, please.....html08-Jan-2005 06:48 669
[TXT]11313348_Re:What does this tell you about Stallman's crusad.html10-Jan-2005 03:18 331
[TXT]11313419_Re:Some of these predictions are -1 redundant.html10-Jan-2005 03:24 162
[TXT]11314016_Re:same feeling with S-ATA.html10-Jan-2005 04:05 226
[TXT]11314074_Re:Many Things.html10-Jan-2005 04:10 229
[TXT]11314109_Replace PAM.html10-Jan-2005 04:13 400
[TXT]11329218_Re:Sleep Apnea (OSA).html11-Jan-2005 07:55 323
[TXT]11330858_Re:Do we really need....html11-Jan-2005 10:45 332
[TXT]11331797_Re:WMP-out.html11-Jan-2005 01:03 277
[TXT]11331889_Re:competition is good, usually.html11-Jan-2005 01:22 421
[TXT]11332067_Re:and still no ATI AIW support.html12-Jan-2005 01:47 345
[TXT]11332088_Re:Uhh....html12-Jan-2005 01:50 435
[TXT]11339026_Re:Free as in beer.html12-Jan-2005 02:53 838
[TXT]11339222_Re:In other words.html12-Jan-2005 03:06 440
[TXT]11376883_Re:So useful for Windows OC'ers.html15-Jan-2005 10:17 208
[TXT]11376901_Re:So useful for Windows OC'ers.html15-Jan-2005 10:21 615
[TXT]11376923_Re:So useful for Windows OC'ers.html15-Jan-2005 10:30 181
[TXT]11377108_Re:Education no longer matters.html15-Jan-2005 11:14 595
[TXT]11379732_Re:You should listen to him....html14-Jan-2005 01:55 430
[TXT]11381398_Re: What?.html13-Jan-2005 06:28 266
[TXT]11381429_Re:You should listen to him....html14-Jan-2005 06:33 404
[TXT]11383307_Re:Tux Racer.html16-Jan-2005 01:19 290
[TXT]11383399_Re:Storage.html16-Jan-2005 01:53 381
[TXT]11383465_Re:You should listen to him....html14-Jan-2005 02:16 407
[TXT]11383492_Re:Education no longer matters.html15-Jan-2005 02:26 1.7K
[TXT]11393023_Re:Off the top of my head, here you go.html17-Jan-2005 03:03 150
[TXT]11405189_Re:Storage.html16-Jan-2005 12:18 176
[TXT]11415655_Re:I read the FA.html17-Jan-2005 09:29 479
[TXT]11435341_Re:I read the FA.html17-Jan-2005 03:23 353
[TXT]11464566_Re:The bottom line.html20-Jan-2005 10:57 535
[TXT]11469482_Re:duh.html25-Jan-2005 11:42 203
[TXT]11482868_Re:duh.html25-Jan-2005 01:42 227
[TXT]11498536_Re:correlational!.html23-Jan-2005 06:52 248
[TXT]11498748_Re:MOD PARENT UP!!!.html22-Jan-2005 07:13 200
[TXT]11514588_Re:Ho-hum.html29-Jan-2005 01:49 420
[TXT]11516518_Re:why *I* like the GPL ....html29-Jan-2005 07:01 1.1K
[TXT]11516578_Re:Ho-hum.html29-Jan-2005 07:09 1.3K
[TXT]11516920_Re:In hardware?.html29-Jan-2005 08:10 148
[TXT]11530134_Re:And another idiot.html31-Jan-2005 01:02 305
[TXT]11530168_Re:Matrox?.html31-Jan-2005 01:04 327
[TXT]11530297_Re:What a frackin' idiot.html31-Jan-2005 01:15 2.3K
[TXT]11534684_Re:Matrox?.html31-Jan-2005 06:48 346
[TXT]11534877_Re:What a frackin' idiot.html31-Jan-2005 07:05 1.9K
[TXT]11534902_Re:What a frackin' idiot.html31-Jan-2005 07:07 288
[TXT]11577651_Re:Common sense, for the love of Pete....html04-Feb-2005 05:48 340
[TXT]11577684_Re:Common sense, for the love of Pete....html04-Feb-2005 05:51 331
[TXT]11577810_Re:Common sense, for the love of Pete....html04-Feb-2005 06:03 1.0K
[TXT]11577962_Re:FBI raids themselves.html04-Feb-2005 06:14 379
[TXT]11591046_JPEG-2000 is encumbered by patents.html06-Feb-2005 02:04 232
[TXT]11591422_Re:The problem with windows is.html05-Feb-2005 03:00 320
[TXT]11591897_Re:no brainer - commerial embedded devices.html05-Feb-2005 04:05 635
[TXT]11591908_Re:runs on old and rare archs.html05-Feb-2005 04:07 303
[TXT]11591927_Re:Read the WHOLE article..html05-Feb-2005 04:10 219
[TXT]11593208_Re:my (not so) offtopic dream.html06-Feb-2005 08:04 372
[TXT]11593240_Re:Read the WHOLE article..html05-Feb-2005 08:09 308
[TXT]11593251_Re:my (not so) offtopic dream.html06-Feb-2005 08:12 666
[TXT]11593291_Re:Common sense, for the love of Pete....html04-Feb-2005 08:21 1.6K
[TXT]11593436_Re:Common sense, for the love of Pete....html04-Feb-2005 08:53 3.6K
Apache/2.2.9 (Debian) DAV/2 SVN/1.5.1 PHP/5.2.6-1+lenny9 with Suhosin-Patch mod_ssl/2.2.9 OpenSSL/0.9.8k mod_perl/2.0.4 Perl/v5.10.0 Server at nemesis.home.icequake.net Port 80